Under the new legislation proposed by Massachusetts State Senator Stephen Brewer, bikers 21 and older would be provided the choice to wear a helmet or not.

In the 1,150-reported motorcyclist accident in Massachusetts last year, a 78.5 percent of riders were wearing a helmet. And of this percent, 88 percent were 21 or older. This means that roughly 897 of motorcyclists involved in accidents in 2010 would have had the option to chose to wear a helmet or not. This makes some nervous, while others await the right to chose.

Those for the legislation believe that it is not a bad thing to wear helmets; what is wrong is that it is not personal choice, but required by law. Advocates for the choice believe that when “a motorcyclist gets hurt and killed because of an accident, that is the cause we should go after. We would rather advocate (more) rider training, crash avoidance and more motorist awareness,” said Rick Gleason the legislative director for the Massachusetts Motorcycle Association, (Bill aims to ease motorcycle helmet law, David Riley, Wicked Local-Patriot Ledger,

http://www.patriotledger.com/features/x1622888278/Bill-aims-to-ease-motorcycle-helmet-law). 

Others who oppose the legislation worry that if a motorcyclist is injured in an accident it could potentially cost the government depending on the type of insurance the rider has, or if they have any at all. As Russ Rader, proposed by states Senator Stephen Brewer, argues “it is a personal choice, but when people crash, it becomes a weight on society as a whole because there are higher care costs associated with crash injuries,” (Bill aims to ease motorcycle helmet law, David Riley, Wicked Local-Patriot Ledger). Rader also states that studies have shown that when helmet laws are weakened that the usage of helmets when riding is reduced by roughly 50 percent.

Check back here for the latest news on this proposal.